From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 6 16:54:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD23E16ABCB for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 16:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BAF943D46 for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 16:54:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 12694 invoked by uid 399); 6 Jun 2006 16:54:04 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 Jun 2006 16:54:04 -0000 Message-ID: <4485B328.1080205@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 09:54:00 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Simon L. Nielsen" References: <20060603235511.F57378@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <1149406234.677.15.camel@localhost> <44853BB1.5080701@FreeBSD.org> <20060606101547.GB1057@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <20060606101547.GB1057@zaphod.nitro.dk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, Joel Dahl Subject: Re: Official Hats page is a wee bit out of date X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 16:54:06 -0000 Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2006.06.06 01:24:17 -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> Joel Dahl wrote: >> >>> Part of the problem is that we duplicate info about various teams, hats >>> and responsibilities everywhere in our docs, which makes them a PITA to >>> update. >> I hesitate to bring this up, since I'm not volunteering to do the work, but >> doesn't this sound like a job for entities? > > Yes, unfortunatly it's not that simple since some parts are in doc/ > and some in www/ and name entities are (yet) seperate for the two > repositories. Ok, thanks for clarifying that. So it sounds like we could at least get it down to two locations for each discreet piece of data in the short term? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection