From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 05:29:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F7537B401 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 05:29:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CE943FAF for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 05:29:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4KCT8C2032162; Tue, 20 May 2003 14:29:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Heiko Schaefer From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 May 2003 12:03:19 +0200." <20030520120114.U60060@daneel.foundation.hs> Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 14:29:08 +0200 Message-ID: <32161.1053433748@critter.freebsd.dk> cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gbde performance question X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 12:29:11 -0000 In message <20030520120114.U60060@daneel.foundation.hs>, Heiko Schaefer writes: >but i still don't see why the processes that are named gbde-something >would take up _that_ much cpu time ... does that look reasonable and >explicable to you? The crypto work _does_ take time. I am only just starting to measure how much for my GBDE paper now, so I don't really have anything to compare your numbers with. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.