From nobody Sat Jan 13 08:02:35 2024 X-Original-To: dev-commits-ports-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4TBrVw1mYlz573f9; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 08:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qv1-f51.google.com (mail-qv1-f51.google.com [209.85.219.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4TBrVw03y2z4dbK; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 08:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 6yearold@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-qv1-f51.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-680adbf077dso49931556d6.1; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 00:03:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705132983; x=1705737783; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ZcPeHNiXdAUCLFaxjne6+DxFC+NWxAfuKKp0wL2pizU=; b=hWcTFallfPyrngfyBCDWFliNGyI/lRRdbnOk1Uj5gjilhJDHpUYeeq8xdswZ34ofdq nKzm2fGCkZH8XqjsW3nRWCofQ0vQOXicf6lKcnoxsO+J8hrcqxA/dMXdsBkFVzR1wQOD Z3mgVKcbBlKnATFOkkyqa+usiuo8KXQSaCkCjf243KpiA06OK6/1b8OdID53rMy1/oIs Mg8lhvAj3wV+FFMQU2WSKkkmdft70QmHEKDHvULqssk9OO3zy1e0vWRN9O2pZUXpo2ta 8+H7bIyhYDpJo68rOWF7q5xU0SmZZvNtjgePptOYpmI6660KLSr8sEI9nSwt0s27GS+/ N8QA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyfxWS3NxhpG14+2svhkuXWBXtNORFlkkb+s8cWQlO62OwHvoBL Ea1CxroVvgeZiWB1r3TTB3YYivbdbLGegfKH X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHSDNRIbFyHzB6yNoajQ0DwpE/FFjnLvodUFDU941bEAJhJjncuFR0vv/3peAQqCt6kNaNYcw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:ca7:b0:67f:b763:81a with SMTP id s7-20020a0562140ca700b0067fb763081amr2874150qvs.47.1705132982929; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 00:03:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qk1-f179.google.com (mail-qk1-f179.google.com. [209.85.222.179]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t10-20020a0cef0a000000b00681348887d1sm1632902qvr.66.2024.01.13.00.03.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 13 Jan 2024 00:03:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk1-f179.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7831ed13d39so568514285a.0; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 00:03:02 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7f81:0:b0:429:ad40:4517 with SMTP id z1-20020ac87f81000000b00429ad404517mr3828185qtj.82.1705132982532; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 00:03:02 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Commits to the main branch of the FreeBSD ports repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-ports-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202401121705.40CH5JhG014492@gitrepo.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: From: Gleb Popov Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 11:02:35 +0300 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: git: 25e6f68a6661 - main - textproc/libxml2: Update to 2.11.6 To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: Daniel Engberg , ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4TBrVw03y2z4dbK X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US] On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 8:14=E2=80=AFAM Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > Wait, what? You've just removed the comment which tells to NOT use the > dreaded CMake and made the switch without logging any rationale? CMake > in such low-sitting in dependency tree port is a PITA for many people, > please don't push it down our throats as you've been repeatedly asked by > other fellow developers. > > ./danfe I admit that there is no rationale for the switch in the commit message. But at the same time, reducing build times for Ports consumers has much lower priority for us than actually updating software. Daniel made sure that the switch doesn't cause circular dependencies which was a problem before. Because of that I approved the change, just for the sake of the "updating" part. Daniel is not being paid for this work, so if he's more comfortable with CMake (which I wholeheartedly understand!) it is a sufficient rationale for the switch. I believe no one will be against if you prepare a patch that will switch back to autotools and do the same amount of testing (500+ ports) that Daniel did. =3D=3D=3D arrowd with a portmgr-lurker hat on top