From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 11 10:36:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D27916A4CE for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 10:36:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ticketswitch.com (mail.ticketswitch.com [194.200.93.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F8543D5D for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 10:36:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petefrench@ticketswitch.com) Received: from [172.16.1.6] (helo=dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk) by mail.ticketswitch.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1DVoZq-000Hkr-L1; Wed, 11 May 2005 11:36:30 +0100 Received: from petefrench by dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1DVoZq-0003gu-Ff; Wed, 11 May 2005 11:36:30 +0100 To: spamrefuse@yahoo.com, subhro.kar@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <4281B873.7020208@gmail.com> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 11:36:30 +0100 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 May 2005 12:29:33 +0000 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xl(4) & polling X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:36:33 -0000 > 100 should be fine. 10 would be a bit too much overkill. I think you have this the wrong way round - the smaller this number is the *less* often it will poll the device. Its in hertz remember. So 10 is only polling ten times a second, whereas 100 is polling 100 times a second. If you are getting dropped packets then *increase* the number so that it polls more often. -pcf.