From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Aug 15 05:10:42 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA23584 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 15 Aug 1997 05:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shrimp.dataplex.net (shrimp.dataplex.net [208.2.87.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA23579 for ; Fri, 15 Aug 1997 05:10:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [208.2.87.4] (user4.dataplex.net [208.2.87.4]) by shrimp.dataplex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA29912; Fri, 15 Aug 1997 07:10:19 -0500 (CDT) X-Sender: rkw@mail.dataplex.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <199708151127.EAA23908@hokkshideh.jetcafe.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Fri, 15 Aug 1997 07:09:53 -0500 To: Dave Hayes From: Richard Wackerbarth Subject: Re: Besides time, what the heck does it take ... Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 6:27 AM -0500 8/15/97, Dave Hayes wrote: >Also, is 3.0 the last OS revision tree split FreeBSD will undergo? >(Maybe I should duck, but...I gotta know.) I should hope not! As long as the general architecture is viable, there should continue to be improvements. To deny the ability to make fundamental changes to the API dooms the system to perpetual legacy baggage.