From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr  9 13:09:42 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8548A0
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue,  9 Apr 2013 13:09:42 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com)
Received: from rush.bluerosetech.com (rush.bluerosetech.com
 [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:9b00::25])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67AD894E
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue,  9 Apr 2013 13:09:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from chombo.houseloki.net
 (montesse-2-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:19b9::2])
 by rush.bluerosetech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE1F21144E;
 Tue,  9 Apr 2013 06:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:fc00:970::e812:4ecc:5220:8206] (unknown
 [IPv6:fc00:970::e812:4ecc:5220:8206])
 by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 88E9AC2F;
 Tue,  9 Apr 2013 06:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51641315.3080704@bluerosetech.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 06:09:41 -0700
From: Darren Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Florent Peterschmitt <florent@peterschmitt.fr>
Subject: Re: Growing list of required(ish) ports
References: <CA+QLa9Af3CC=FKMkrnmSL_-frW7ZvCQJ3=q7xkHUz5-3YyE3fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <51622F44.3050604@FreeBSD.org>
 <CA+QLa9C5pfcRWrLXEiKzZEvVYd5W=wbN9i5wjtp=m92Fn8oq5w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+7WWSfwGBfXRcmc0UJ2ebguq5+-pYY82eopicpPcgeKxUCj3A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN6yY1ttmkiV_ns1qfhjd8ROiZ8WfUfmaj+a1N6Ezapj3-QNcw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOjFWZ6EMjsBLHde-x7ZAx1qPmCB+vOSyCt-WWkmxtYfJsCJQw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+t49PLz4-kg-=umrPm5Aad6Wjj=Ud=n=js39EJ-dEzJ60MmrQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1365441764.4112.1.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <1365441764.4112.1.camel@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 13:09:42 -0000

On 2013-04-08 10:22, Florent Peterschmitt wrote:
> Yep, OpenSSH is tiny enought to keep it in base system. It would be a
> big loss not to have it by default, securely installed in the base
> system.

I really wish it wasn't.  Having OpenSSH (and thus OpenSSL) in the base 
means FreeBSD has an outdated version installed by default.  You have to 
install openssl from ports in order to have modern cipher support, TLS 
v1.1/1.2, DTLS, etc.  This puts two sets of openssl libs on the system 
and creates recurrent headaches with builds where the autoconfiguration 
selects the wrong set of libs.