From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Sun Jul 5 16:03:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC1CA825 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 16:03:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x22c.google.com (mail-ob0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3F851E6A for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 16:03:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: by obbop1 with SMTP id op1so93283452obb.2 for ; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 09:03:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=vUkGDlLxu0ne5bw9CmoKvjO+xZILYqqahCdGfOwOZng=; b=hsY12jy9MKcrOzPwwYUT4lJvVovn4+scxAmV6BGZBCxA3HTVWj4mQmUdaxOdT3YazA ZfVoV9XCgWqJYzXYdAym4LCZoQrAeVMaz1Sl2+pQ8goZxStgRsH5RFKn+7cE0xGjh641 yypqvBCX4Vliu1wbXOLqQiFBsJxcbwagiK92y4/y7ac5BxLqNDt2EghGtV5PgdhJC82o CERtuMdGofCNdzIx82Qd6fsMGrKcfX+ci939XA4zzEsIeBHFwmR/eH4a9lTevgNQRuub ULRgcQeLBJ4rl6r0ai2pH3aQyWk6Rq6JOX1jkmC3opJkiXAWM4KirqbIAmiZYoTvetz2 +2VA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.95.69 with SMTP id di5mr41329144obb.73.1436112189963; Sun, 05 Jul 2015 09:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.81.100 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 09:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.81.100 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 09:03:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5599496C.6010702@sneakertech.com> Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2015 09:03:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: Re: A question about ZFS built-in SMB From: Freddie Cash To: FreeBSD Filesystems Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:03:11 -0000 Forgot to include the list in the reply. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Freddie Cash" Date: Jul 5, 2015 8:55 AM Subject: Re: A question about ZFS built-in SMB To: "Quartz" Cc: On Jul 5, 2015 8:13 AM, "Quartz" wrote: > > Assuming the following: > > - A server running FreeBSD 10.1 > > - A ZFS pool with no restrictions on how it can be set up > > - Clients running Windows XP/Vista/7/8 > > - The need for a "public share" with two main directories, which we'll call 'stuff' and 'dropbox'. Anonymous guest users have read/write access to 'dropbox', and read-only access to 'stuff' as well as being restricted in which files and directories they can even see there. Admin-class users have full permissions and visibility to both directories. > > > > Is installing Samba still a requirement, or is ZFS's built-in SMB sharing complete and robust enough now to be able to handle everything natively? (Alternatively, is SMB itself even still a requirement or are there other options these days (that don't require installing software or custom configs on the clients))? SMB support is only built-in on Solaris derivatives. You need Samba on everything else.