From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 30 13:25:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD62E106566C for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:25:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2AEFE8FC0A for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73498 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2012 13:18:48 -0000 Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33) by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 30 Mar 2012 13:18:48 -0000 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:18:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20120330.151848.41706133.sthaug@nethelp.no> To: matt.thyer@gmail.com From: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: References: <4F746F1E.6090702@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4F74BCE8.2030802@vangyzen.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de, eric@vangyzen.net, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:25:31 -0000 > > However, if you always want to use tmpfs instead of stable storage, > please do not. Some people expect /tmp to be persistent. This is why > /etc/defaults/rc.conf has clear_tmp_enable="NO". Changing this would break > the POLA. > > > This is a mistake. > > The default should be clear_tmp_enable="YES" > if only to uncover those broken configurations that expect /tmp to be > persistent. If you want to break POLA and make a lot of people angry, sure. Otherwise no. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no