Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:18:48 +0200 (CEST) From: sthaug@nethelp.no To: matt.thyer@gmail.com Cc: ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de, eric@vangyzen.net, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using TMPFS for /tmp and /var/run? Message-ID: <20120330.151848.41706133.sthaug@nethelp.no> In-Reply-To: <CACM2%2B-7Ahn6J=CTASe0g48%2BSD2vvLVd_hG3DRZmvO31QszG5Xw@mail.gmail.com> References: <4F746F1E.6090702@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4F74BCE8.2030802@vangyzen.net> <CACM2%2B-7Ahn6J=CTASe0g48%2BSD2vvLVd_hG3DRZmvO31QszG5Xw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > However, if you always want to use tmpfs instead of stable storage, > please do not. Some people expect /tmp to be persistent. This is why > /etc/defaults/rc.conf has clear_tmp_enable="NO". Changing this would break > the POLA. > > > This is a mistake. > > The default should be clear_tmp_enable="YES" > if only to uncover those broken configurations that expect /tmp to be > persistent. If you want to break POLA and make a lot of people angry, sure. Otherwise no. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120330.151848.41706133.sthaug>