From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Fri Dec 7 20:14:55 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA641318D5E for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 20:14:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5EE1758B2 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 20:14:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 658231318D5D; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 20:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A97E1318D5C for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 20:14:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B95A5758B0 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 20:14:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 017D29F18 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 20:14:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wB7KEqiI023560 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 20:14:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id wB7KEqqt023559 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 7 Dec 2018 20:14:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233764] [amdtemp] does not recognize AMD A8-7600 temperature sensors Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 20:14:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: cem@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A5EE1758B2 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.95 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.983,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.978,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:10310, ipnet:2001:1900:2254::/48, country:US]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.994,0] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 20:14:55 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233764 --- Comment #15 from Conrad Meyer --- (In reply to gosha-necr from comment #13) > pciconf -r pci0:0:24:3 0x64 > 72240005 HTC_TMP_LMT: python3 -c 'print(((0x72240005 >> 16) & 0x7f) * 0.5 + 52)' 70.0 I.e., 70 "=C2=B0C" in whatever scale Tctl is on is "max," I guess. Given t= hat seems low, there is probably an offset on that scale. I don't know what it is, a= nd the Power and Thermal Document does not seem to be published :(. (In reply to gosha-necr from comment #14) > pciconf -r pci0:0:24:3 0xa4 > 0b600fef CurTmpTjSel: python3 -c 'print((0x0b600fef >> 16) & 0x3)' 0 (I.e., RangeUnajusted=3D1) CurTmp: python3 -c 'print(((0x0b600fef >> 21) & 0x7ff) * 0.125)' 11.375 (=C2=B0C, nominal) > pciconf -r pci0:0:24:3 0x64 > 664c0005 HTC_TMP_LMT: python3 -c 'print(((0x664c0005 >> 16) & 0x7f) * 0.5 + 52)' 90.0 So this one is maybe 20=C2=B0 less offset than the other one, although I'm = not sure of that =E2=80=94 maybe the other one just throttles more aggressively. It= seems like the total offset can't be much more than 5-10=C2=B0 since 100=C2=B0C is qui= te hot for a CPU. But given HDDtemp of 28=C2=B0C, I don't know. That'd suggest 17=C2= =B0+ offset, which makes for a throttle at 107=C2=B0+. Extremely hot. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=