From owner-cvs-all Thu Feb 4 05:19:33 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA13019 for cvs-all-outgoing; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 05:19:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.204.136.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA13012 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 05:19:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA27312; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 14:19:07 +0100 (CET) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id OAA25726; Thu, 4 Feb 1999 14:19:05 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 14:19:01 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund To: Mark Newton Cc: committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: elf_brand_inuse() Message-ID: <19990204141900.W8749@bitbox.follo.net> References: <199902041244.XAA00429@atdot.dotat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.1i In-Reply-To: <199902041244.XAA00429@atdot.dotat.org>; from Mark Newton on Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 11:14:00PM +1030 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Thu, Feb 04, 1999 at 11:14:00PM +1030, Mark Newton wrote: > > I've just added an "elf_brand_inuse()" routine to imgact_elf.c, > enabling emulators to work out whether they're being used before > they unload themselves out from under some poor unfortunate > process. > > Should I modify the other emulators to use this mechanism as well, > or are they actively maintained by someone else? In general: If you introduce a new piece of infrastructure, people will usually not object if you fix the places that (should) use it, too. In this specific case: There is nobody doing really agressive maintenance on the emulators, so I don't think anybody will mind (and I think it would take a while before somebody else did it). Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message