Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:27:51 -0300
From: Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <rnsanchez@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: optimization levels for 6-STABLE build{kernel,world}
Message-ID: <20060914132751.72c76a72.rnsanchez@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060914044241.GA92358@thought.org>
References: <200609130905.k8D95idk062789@lurza.secnetix.de> <4507CC9B.60704@sun-fish.com> <20060913234934.GA92067@thought.org> <0B8BF03E-8F4A-4279-850B-2EA7FF5E1B89@mac.com> <20060914044241.GA92358@thought.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:42:41 -0700, Gary Kline <kline@sage.thought.org>
wrote:
> Isn't the compiler intelligent enough to have a reasonable
> limit, N, of the loops it will unroll to ensure a faster runtime?
Yes, and also permits the user to choose if internal heuristics should be
used, user-specified loop size to unroll, and unroll-all-loops.
--
Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez <rnsanchez@{gmail.com,wait4.org}>
Powered by FreeBSD
"Left to themselves, things tend to go from bad to worse."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060914132751.72c76a72.rnsanchez>