From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 04:25:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5A816A4CE for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 04:25:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from wn1.sci.kun.nl (wn1.sci.kun.nl [131.174.8.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6630B43D1D for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 04:25:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adridg@sci.kun.nl) Received: from wn4.sci.kun.nl by wn1.sci.kun.nl id hBHCP1Yj025374 (8.12.10/3.58); Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:25:01 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 13:25:01 +0100 (MET) From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200312170549.hBH5nwKF096166@bigtex.jrv.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: emacs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: adridg@cs.kun.nl List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 12:25:04 -0000 On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, James Van Artsdalen wrote: > 2. unexelf.c was only using 32 bit things instead of 64. > In this case it is the FreeBSD ports patch file that actually > needs to change (these lines aren't present at all in the > xemacs distribution). Mmm-hmm. That's pretty much the same kind of things I ran into while porting gcl 2.5.3 (the i386 port compiles and then crashes immediately while bootstrapping). If gcl is still actively maintained it should get the fixes from emacs eventually. Once I've actually got it running I'll post the patches here as well. (Oh, and please please use unidiff (diff -u), since it's so much easier to read.) -- Adriaan de Groot adridg@cs.kun.nl Kamer A6020 024-3652272 GPG Key Fingerprint 934E 31AA 80A7 723F 54F9 50ED 76AC EE01 FEA2 A3FE http://www.cs.kun.nl/~adridg/research/