From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Feb 6 07:30:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA28798 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 07:30:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sumatra.americantv.com (sumatra.americantv.com [207.170.17.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA28789; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 07:30:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jlemon@americantv.com) Received: from right.PCS (right.PCS [148.105.10.31]) by sumatra.americantv.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA29200; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 09:29:05 -0600 (CST) Received: (from jlemon@localhost) by right.PCS (8.6.13/8.6.4) id JAA00627; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 09:28:34 -0600 Message-ID: <19980206092833.47410@right.PCS> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 09:28:33 -0600 From: Jonathan Lemon To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: John Birrell , garbanzo@hooked.net, sysseh@workcover.qld.gov.au, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Elves wanted - apply within References: <199802060825.TAA11003@cimlogic.com.au> <199802061153.GAA01101@dyson.iquest.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.61.1 In-Reply-To: <199802061153.GAA01101@dyson.iquest.net>; from John S. Dyson on Feb 02, 1998 at 06:53:22AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe hackers" On Feb 02, 1998 at 06:53:22AM -0500, John S. Dyson wrote: > > Sorry Alex, but I still have a problem with you continuing to include > > this in your .sig, particularly (1) when it looks like you've said > > it as part of the discussion; and (2) when it has been pointed out > > to you that some people might take offence. > > > My signature is likely much more offensive -- it might even have > cultural ramifications :-(. Kirk made a suggestion that might > make it appear to be more mild, and maybe I will adopt it. But, > oh well... The world is getting smaller isn't it??? That is > good and bad. Oh, no, the political correctness people strike again! I like your .sig, leave it alone. Oink. :-) As for Alex's, my suggestion is that he use a '--' signature separator, and put the .sig below that. It doesn't offend me, but it doesn't _look_ like a sig; it looks like part of the commentary, and is confusing. -- Jonathan