From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jan 25 12:37:43 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA16813 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 25 Jan 1998 12:37:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (sri-gw.MT.net [206.127.105.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA16547 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 1998 12:36:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA06708; Sun, 25 Jan 1998 13:36:31 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id NAA29040; Sun, 25 Jan 1998 13:36:29 -0700 Date: Sun, 25 Jan 1998 13:36:29 -0700 Message-Id: <199801252036.NAA29040@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andreas Klemm Cc: Nate Williams , Eivind Eklund , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: why not CVS server support ? In-Reply-To: <19980125204353.52228@klemm.gtn.com> References: <19980125175618.10691@klemm.gtn.com> <19980125183247.09801@follo.net> <199801251932.MAA28784@mt.sri.com> <19980125204353.52228@klemm.gtn.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.29 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > > > Why don't we support cvs server in the base OS ? > > > > > > (I assume you mean the cvs pserver mode?) Why would we want to? > > > > And what gives you the impression we don't support it? > > Our /usr/src/contrib/cvs sources looked a bit stripped down. > Somewhere (I think in the OpenBSD sources) I saw a sever subdir, OpenBSD has made many changes to their copy of CVS (in particular the anonCVS stuff), so that may be what you are seeing. > that I didn't see in our sources. So I was under the impression, > that we were are missing something. The OpenBSD CVS sources aren't stock (or at least weren't last time I looked at them.) Nate