From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 8 14:20:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED60C16A403 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:20:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBB043D53 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:20:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k48EKSjK062868 for ; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:20:28 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k48EKSPr062867; Mon, 8 May 2006 14:20:28 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 14:20:28 GMT Message-Id: <200605081420.k48EKSPr062867@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org From: Vasil Dimov Cc: Subject: Re: docs/96639: [patch] suggestion to committer's guide that should have a description about remove ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Vasil Dimov List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2006 14:20:29 -0000 The following reply was made to PR docs/96639; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Vasil Dimov To: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/96639: [patch] suggestion to committer's guide that should have a description about remove ports Date: Mon, 8 May 2006 17:18:42 +0300 On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 05:12:29PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-05-08 16:57, Vasil Dimov wrote: > >On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 04:51:41PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >> On 2006-05-04 08:10, Vasil Dimov wrote: > >> > Looks fine, here is a slightly modified version: > >> > > >> > + Removing an Existing Port > >> > + > >> > + > >> [...] > >> > + However, there is a > >> > + ports/Tools/scripts/rmport script > >> > + that automates all the necessary steps for removing a port. > >> > + It was written by &a.vd;, who is also the current maintainer > >> > + so please send questions/patches about > >> > + rmport to him. > >> > + > >> > >> Since `rmport' is an alternative way of removing a port, how about the > >> following minor rewording of the above paragraph? > >> > >> Alternatively, you can use the rmport script, > >> from ports/Tools/scripts. > >> This script has been written by &a.vd;, who is also its current > >> maintainer, so please send questions, patches or suggestions about > >> rmport to him. > > Sounds good. > > > >> > >> Also, is anyone going to commit the changes of this PR? They look like > >> a useful addition to the docs. Let's not leave them to rot in Gnats for > >> too long :-) > > > > Well, I guess one needs a doc commit bit to do so? > > Or a review from a doc-committer. You have mine already. Or, I can > do the doc-build test & commit work, if you are satisfied with the > current version of the patch :) > Ok, I am satisfied with the current version of the patch. If you do not commit it within the next 24 hours (or so) I will do it myself using Approved by: you Have a nice day! -- Vasil Dimov gro.DSBeerF@dv Testing can show the presence of bugs, but not their absence. -- Edsger W. Dijkstra