From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Apr 17 09:19:52 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA18191 for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 09:19:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kremvax.demos.su (kremvax.demos.su [194.87.0.20]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA18175 for ; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 09:19:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by kremvax.demos.su (8.6.13/D) from 0@sinbin.demos.su [194.87.0.31] with ESMTP id UAA18547; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 20:16:13 +0400 Received: by sinbin.demos.su id UAA06496; (8.6.12/D) Thu, 17 Apr 1997 20:14:45 +0400 From: bag@sinbin.demos.su (Alex G. Bulushev) Message-Id: <199704171614.UAA06496@sinbin.demos.su> Subject: Re: Pentuim or Pentuim Pro ? To: tom@inna.net (Thomas Arnold) Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 20:14:45 +0400 (MSD) Cc: michaelv@mindbender.serv.net, drussell@saturn-tech.com, chuckr@glue.umd.edu, steve@visint.co.uk, dave@persprog.com, hardware@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Thomas Arnold" at Apr 17, 97 11:59:04 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME7a] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hardware@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > That's nice, but can you post a competative comparison against > > something else? The stats do nothing for me all by themselves. > > Thanks. > > Chips I have on hand : K5-133, K6-166, Cyrix 6x86-166. I will re-bench > all of them on the same board. > > If you have benchmarks other then Nsieve and FLOPS you'd like to see run > I'll run them too. I expect to be able to do this tonight. it is also interesting to run bytebench (we have a colection of bytebench results for different platforms and cpu's) Alex. > > +-----------------------------------------------+ > : Tom Arnold - No relation to Rosanne : > : SysAdmin/Pres - TBI, Ltd ( inna.net ) : > : The Middle Peninsula's Internet Connection : > +-----------------------------------------------+ > >