From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun  9 21:25:13 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D8A93D3
 for <net@freebsd.org>; Mon,  9 Jun 2014 21:25:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lauren.room52.net (lauren.room52.net [210.50.193.198])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF259245D
 for <net@freebsd.org>; Mon,  9 Jun 2014 21:25:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lgwl-lstewart2.corp.netflix.com (unknown [69.53.237.72])
 by lauren.room52.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CE017E8C2;
 Tue, 10 Jun 2014 07:25:10 +1000 (EST)
Message-ID: <53953725.7060604@freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 14:25:09 +1000
From: Lawrence Stewart <lstewart@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hiren panchasara <hiren.panchasara@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ECN marking implenetation for dummynet
References: <533BF902.7010506@sfc.wide.ad.jp>	<CAJ-Vmokm+=xdd+ayMFn5epSC-z5+SSDgEk-qX0phJj=itS6AEA@mail.gmail.com>	<CALCpEUHPJqtad7j1sxM8CU_amaKg-c4kcWFX8bF_GkJDhDTDFw@mail.gmail.com>	<CALCpEUEp-8vkuPrttmzWLHAS-xeef0qPww7-jGf7+o0HmgmAqA@mail.gmail.com>	<CALCpEUH=Se=CWqa8yWPEXJgaQcPbhTH_-UqOHz2e-4v_ka2QwQ@mail.gmail.com>	<539570F8.2010105@freebsd.org>
 <CALCpEUF3AQJsKsOoiOuyNK5L-++yn3kKspTMjGkW-rmF84ib1w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALCpEUF3AQJsKsOoiOuyNK5L-++yn3kKspTMjGkW-rmF84ib1w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,
 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lauren.room52.net
Cc: "net@freebsd.org" <net@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 21:25:13 -0000

On 06/09/14 18:47, hiren panchasara wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Lawrence Stewart <lstewart@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> On 6/8/2014 9:07 PM, hiren panchasara wrote:
> <skip>
>>> I wish to MFC this change and following actual dctcp changes (which
>>> I'll commit to -head in coming weeks) to 10.
>>>
>>> Let me know if there is any objection to it.
>>
>>
>> Please don't MFC the DCTCP stuff until I've had a chance to consider the KPI
>> changes. Prodding me to do so is likely a good idea.
> 
> I am in no rush to MFC. But I didn't quite get what you are talking
> about wrt KPI changes.

Unless Midori's DCTCP work has changed significantly since I first
reviewed it in 2013, it changes the modular congestion control KPI. I'd
like to review the work again but don't want to delay it getting into
head because I'm super busy. Just asking that it not be MFCed before
I've given it a review.

Cheers,
Lawrence