Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:20:26 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A 7 vs 8 db benchmark Message-ID: <86ljfkj3k5.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <hjdega$a6d$1@ger.gmane.org> (Ivan Voras's message of "Sat, 23 Jan 2010 01:05:29 %2B0100") References: <hjdega$a6d$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> writes: > This is a bit old, I forgot to post it earlier: > > http://suckit.blog.hu/2009/10/05/freebsd_8_is_it_worth_to_upgrade > > Some interesting graphs there. Jeff Roberson said the bogus CPU > topology shouldn't influence end-performance much. He thinks the > lockmgr rewrite was responsible for most of the big performance > difference. Were the benchmarks run with or without the topology patch? If without, could you ask the author to re-run them with the patch? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86ljfkj3k5.fsf>