From owner-freebsd-bugs  Tue Apr 18 10:49:32 1995
Return-Path: bugs-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA12715
          for bugs-outgoing; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 10:49:32 -0700
Received: from mail.Germany.EU.net (mail.Germany.EU.net [192.76.144.65])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA12708
          for <freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 10:49:24 -0700
From: Bernard.Steiner@Germany.EU.net
Received: by mail.Germany.EU.net with ESMTP (8.6.5:29/EUnetD-2.5.1.d) via EUnet
	id TAA05793; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 19:49:44 +0200
Message-Id: <199504181749.TAA07845@qwerty.Germany.EU.net>
Received: from localhost.Germany.EU.net
	by qwerty.Germany.EU.net with SMTP (8.6.4/EUnetDlan-1.14-1.2.0)
	via EUnet for [mail.germany.eu.net]
	id TAA07845; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 19:49:37 +0200
To: davidg@Root.COM
cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: couple of bugs in 2.0R 
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 18 Apr 1995 04:39:02 PDT.
             <199504181139.EAA00249@corbin.Root.COM> 
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 19:49:14 +0200
Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Oops.

     >It works now with the watchdog at 20; I've re-tried the original kernel w
    ith a
     >watchdog set to 2, and that failed.

This is, in fact, incorrect. The kernels don't even differ in the watchdog
timer interval. :-O I just discovered that I actually managed to get the
stupid #ifdef wrong so it was still using the 2 setting. What I ask myself
now is: Why doesn't the previous kernel work, but the new one does ?
I'll try and find differences in the configuration.

In other words: please forget my previous ranting on the if_ed watchdog.

Sorry for wasting your time on this.

Bernard