From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 23 04:01:10 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6886E16A421;
	Tue, 23 May 2006 04:01:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (vc4-2-0-87.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E5A43D48;
	Tue, 23 May 2006 04:01:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [IPv6:::1] (may be forged))
	by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k4N3xjEj078858;
	Mon, 22 May 2006 21:59:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 21:59:45 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20060522.215945.74674757.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: rwatson@freebsd.org
From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060522172636.Y21787@fledge.watson.org>
References: <20060522143521.J21787@fledge.watson.org>
	<20060522085405.Y34519@ns1.feral.com>
	<20060522172636.Y21787@fledge.watson.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: your mail
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 04:01:10 -0000

> I've been following Scott's CAM work in P4 with great interest,
> albeit little or no insight, since I know almost nothing about the
> SCSI layer.  My brain is simply too small...

Well, the good news here is that we don't have any SCSI Ethernet
support.

Warner