From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 11 23:04:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F8316A4DA for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:04:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kramer@centtech.com) Received: from mh2.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [64.129.166.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2275013C4F8 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:04:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kramer@centtech.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([10.90.2.8]) by mh2.centtech.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2BN3xCf043402; Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:04:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kramer@centtech.com) Message-ID: <45F48BC7.4030403@centtech.com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:07:51 -0500 From: Kevin Kramer User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Edwin Groothuis References: <45F17BB5.1030109@centtech.com> <20070310215826.GU90162@k7.mavetju> <45F343B0.1060903@centtech.com> <20070311212955.GV90162@k7.mavetju> In-Reply-To: <20070311212955.GV90162@k7.mavetju> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/2809/Sun Mar 11 13:05:07 2007 on mh2.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_50_60, HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=ham version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on mh2.centtech.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/zoneinfo port on 6.1R and others X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 23:04:13 -0000 well, it looks like I'm ok today on the machines in question. so it's probably just the binary that needs updating. Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 05:48:00PM -0600, Kevin Kramer wrote: > >> the machines are mixed, 32 and 64-bit >> > > I know that zdump doesn't always work on 64 bit machines, but on > 32 bit machines I've never seen the problem. > > Edwin > >