From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jan 1 10:36:20 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA08524 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 1 Jan 1999 10:36:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA08517; Fri, 1 Jan 1999 10:36:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.1/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA00606; Fri, 1 Jan 1999 19:34:04 +0100 (CET) To: sthaug@nethelp.no cc: des@flood.ping.uio.no, current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebesd-test@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Postfix is coming. new uid, gid required. In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 01 Jan 1999 19:08:59 +0100." <26928.915214139@verdi.nethelp.no> Date: Fri, 01 Jan 1999 19:34:04 +0100 Message-ID: <604.915215644@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <26928.915214139@verdi.nethelp.no>, sthaug@nethelp.no writes: >> One more thing: whether intended or not, by importing it into the >> source tree, the Project places a stamp of approval on PostFix. Are we >> ready to do that? I, for one, would *never* run PostFix, as it is >> today, on a computer to which regular users have shell access. We do ? Do we also condone the gnu C extensions by using their compiler ? I don't think so... -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "ttyv0" -- What UNIX calls a $20K state-of-the-art, 3D, hi-res color terminal To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message