Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 9 Jan 2017 23:48:59 +0100
From:      Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>
To:        Jan Bramkamp <crest@rlwinm.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client
Message-ID:  <5874135B.4000900@quip.cz>
In-Reply-To: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de>
References:  <c798f1e9-92f0-1d2a-32e4-46dad59f05d0@FreeBSD.org> <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jan Bramkamp wrote on 2017/01/05 11:30:
> On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install
>> both samba44
>> and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository?
>> Or samba44 and KDE?
>>
>> If yes, then that sucks...
>
> Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set
> the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary
> packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no longer see
> removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to justify the
> complexity. Are there any reasons other than saved build time to disable
> this dependency (e.g. a bad security track record/process, different
> licenses)?

And what is the right way to choose SASL / NON-SASL version globaly?
We are building packages in our poudriere, but I cannot find the proper 
variable / option for this.

Miroslav Lachman



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5874135B.4000900>