Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 23:48:59 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> To: Jan Bramkamp <crest@rlwinm.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client Message-ID: <5874135B.4000900@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de> References: <c798f1e9-92f0-1d2a-32e4-46dad59f05d0@FreeBSD.org> <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jan Bramkamp wrote on 2017/01/05 11:30: > On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install >> both samba44 >> and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository? >> Or samba44 and KDE? >> >> If yes, then that sucks... > > Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set > the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary > packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no longer see > removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to justify the > complexity. Are there any reasons other than saved build time to disable > this dependency (e.g. a bad security track record/process, different > licenses)? And what is the right way to choose SASL / NON-SASL version globaly? We are building packages in our poudriere, but I cannot find the proper variable / option for this. Miroslav Lachman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5874135B.4000900>