From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Aug 2 4:19:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E40014D02; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 04:19:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id NAA51118; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 13:19:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , John-Mark Gurney , hackers@FreeBSD.org, committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Mentioning RFC numbers in /etc/services References: <79161.933592574@axl.noc.iafrica.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 02 Aug 1999 13:19:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn's message of "Mon, 02 Aug 1999 13:16:14 +0200" Message-ID: Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sheldon Hearn writes: > On 02 Aug 1999 13:05:17 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > The correct way to do this is to fix getservbyname() so it accepts > > port numbers. > Would this not still require modifications to /etc/services for services > not already mentioned in that file? Allow me to re-quote the message I answered: > I vote for allowing inetd.conf to specify a port number instead of a > service name... DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message