From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 30 19:47:38 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA02383 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 19:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA02333 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 19:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cypher.net (black@zen.pratt.edu [205.232.115.155]) by who.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id KAA06263 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 10:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from black@localhost) by cypher.net (8.8.5/8.7.1) id MAA32425; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 12:41:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 12:41:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Ben Black To: Chris Csanady cc: Doug Rabson , Michael Smith , Bruce Evans , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unloading LKMs (was Re: A Desparate Plea for Help...) In-Reply-To: <199704301635.LAA23173@nyx.pr.mcs.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk welcome to solaris. On Wed, 30 Apr 1997, Chris Csanady wrote: > > >The important point is that there is *no difference* between the dynamic > >and statically loaded version of a driver. I can go into a > >/sys/compile/FOO directory and construct loadable modules from the same > >object files. > > How about a statically loaded version of the kernel? I mean, will it now > be nothing more than an aggregate of some modules? It would be nice if > all there were were modules, and to make yourself a kernel, you just > had to stick them together.. > > --Chris Csanady > > >-- > >Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com > >Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 951 1891 > > > > >