From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 15 21:41:56 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D925F16A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:41:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from VARK.MIT.EDU (VARK.MIT.EDU [18.95.3.179])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6643443D45
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:41:56 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from VARK.MIT.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by VARK.MIT.EDU (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBFLeo2G064858;
	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:40:50 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from das@localhost)
	by VARK.MIT.EDU (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iBFLeoEJ064856;
	Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:40:50 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 16:40:50 -0500
From: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Tony Arcieri <tarcieri@atmos.colostate.edu>
Message-ID: <20041215214050.GA64783@VARK.MIT.EDU>
Mail-Followup-To: Tony Arcieri <tarcieri@atmos.colostate.edu>,
	freebsd-current@freebsd.org
References: <20041214222444.GA9668@flash.atmos.colostate.edu>
	<3308.192.168.1.9.1103065723.squirrel@192.168.1.9>
	<20041215001222.GB9957@flash.atmos.colostate.edu>
	<41BF9130.9070907@freebsd.org> <20041215152931.H60504@mail.chesapeake.net>
	<20041215210119.GF17276@flash.atmos.colostate.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20041215210119.GF17276@flash.atmos.colostate.edu>
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern sched_ule.c (fwd)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 21:41:57 -0000

On Wed, Dec 15, 2004, Tony Arcieri wrote:
> And am I correct that the UMA implementation in RELENG_5 has rendered
> proc_fini() obsolete and thus it won't ever be called?

This has very little to do with either UMA or ULE.  Yes, it's
unused, but it's still there as a reminder that it *ought* to be
used.  Unless there are still races I don't know about, it's
probably safe to start using it again.