From owner-freebsd-mobile Sun Jan 7 6:59:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B1137B73C for ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 06:54:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f07EsJs06193; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 07:54:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200101071454.f07EsJs06193@harmony.village.org> To: Peter Wemm Subject: Re: NEWCARD update Cc: Jonathan Chen , freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG, gibbs@scsiguy.com In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 07 Jan 2001 02:03:43 PST." <200101071003.f07A3hB01022@mobile.wemm.org> References: <200101071003.f07A3hB01022@mobile.wemm.org> Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2001 07:54:19 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <200101071003.f07A3hB01022@mobile.wemm.org> Peter Wemm writes: : Personally, I think the bridge itself should be setting this policy since : there appears to be a status bit for the bridge to tell if one of its : cards triggered the interrupt. The bridge can perform the sharing logic : itself. Yes. That's the right place for it. I think all the folks that have approached this issue agree on that. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message