From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Sep 29 9:56:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC3237B401 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 09:56:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.cicely.de (cicely20 [10.1.1.22]) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f8TGuZ627641; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 18:56:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by mail.cicely.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f8TGvEA16217; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 18:57:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 18:57:13 +0200 From: Bernd Walter To: Bsdguru@aol.com Cc: ticso@mail.cicely.de, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ecc on i386 Message-ID: <20010929185712.A16031@cicely20.cicely.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from Bsdguru@aol.com on Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 10:47:54AM -0400 X-Operating-System: NetBSD cicely20.cicely.de 1.5 sparc Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 10:47:54AM -0400, Bsdguru@aol.com wrote: > Well if you didnt snip out the context you wouldnt have an argument at all, > since I said to make it an option to shut down or issue a warning. You mean this: sysctl machdep.panic_on_nmi But I still beleave it's not a good idea to change behavour. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message