Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:30:25 -0700 (MST)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SUMMARY: Fast releases demand binary updates..
Message-ID:  <20060113.213025.48399331.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060112205015.GA13244@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>
References:  <20060112080856.GI84964@svcolo.com> <20060112205015.GA13244@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20060112205015.GA13244@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>
            Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> writes:
: 1) "core" deliberately killed suggestions of improved binary update processes
:    You have yet to produce the e-mails demonstrating this.

I can state authoritative and categorically that core did no such
thing.  I dare anybody to prove me wrong.

Warner Losh
core team member




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060113.213025.48399331.imp>