From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jul 20 20:35:07 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA29819 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Mon, 20 Jul 1998 20:35:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA29804 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 1998 20:35:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA27160; Mon, 20 Jul 1998 20:33:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Alfred Perlstein cc: Joel Ray Holveck , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vn subsystem In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 20 Jul 1998 21:29:08 CDT." Date: Mon, 20 Jul 1998 20:33:39 -0700 Message-ID: <27156.900992019@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > hrm, not really there was some traffic on the lists a few weeks/months > back about it being broken, but that's all i know. Erm, wonderful. Can we have some commentary from someone who's actually proven this either way now? Like I said, my own usage of the vn driver has not shown any such instability. If someone who's _actually used it_ can now comment on its instability, we'll get a lot further. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message