From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Mar 25 11:43:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (ringworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2BCE37B71A for ; Sun, 25 Mar 2001 11:43:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roam@orbitel.bg) Received: (qmail 5756 invoked by uid 1000); 25 Mar 2001 19:42:40 -0000 Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2001 22:42:40 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev To: Thierry Thomas Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/26053: fetchmail 5.7.6: translation of messages with `\r' Message-ID: <20010325224240.G3241@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Thierry Thomas , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200103241800.f2OI04P65097@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010325212850.A77480@graf.pompo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010325212850.A77480@graf.pompo.net>; from thierry@thomas.as on Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 09:28:50PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 09:28:50PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote: > On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 10:00:04AM -0800, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > >Fix: > > > Some messages in po/fetchmail.pot end with `\r\n' > > > => `\n' would suffice? > > > > Does the attached patch to the port solve your problem? It works for me, > > Your patch tries to suppress the `\r', but my question was "is it > legitimate to suppress them?". Perhaps they have some utility? In a word, no. G'luck, Peter -- Nostalgia ain't what it used to be. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message