From owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Sun Dec 23 05:14:17 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79056134BBEC for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 05:14:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BA48A512 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 05:14:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 81B85134BBEB; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 05:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: emulation@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA01134BBEA for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 05:14:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi1-x234.google.com (mail-oi1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB60B8A511 for ; Sun, 23 Dec 2018 05:14:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi1-x234.google.com with SMTP id r62so7990588oie.1 for ; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 21:14:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UNiyKEsfgHKra8eTaKBREmILIO/uIbO5hf8c6Adx8Zg=; b=G7DWwdClK5WSdVrXNRHmDbwlTzMowVsOrgWNEb3MVc6rqIyA585lY5oEfz3R6jXEoD /qgs7qbQsTk5IO0YOi7MwvXVBY//5kVx47nAbe5I77h5DomsYblb51Op38vWGkODSm+D cdK+3DanRNGQN+jXR+d17U90EjI0g0hFiTN0VyKOpLuw3Ff3lmi0ZVaclYTQwjaELnNa dq50pPbWYlJ3SQGNuXDNCA4LUUZTpBfDeVzfppYxmRJ9DlHM28cw7kyAh9PRpfhKyLwt 3MMorBX/MX9pRZtQ2lNoV+i0hdS6YDm+KUmMogmJa3tOvFCjZi04GGiUWhfDg2PKutKK r+4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UNiyKEsfgHKra8eTaKBREmILIO/uIbO5hf8c6Adx8Zg=; b=Uv5aIcQ1veNHb4OQycgQ5F6cU04psdP20Mya6cENBd9LFLSq06U4iOuDisX2CFQ00p yWay39EeHnDfnZEqGy9Hj8YkUI4cINBRf+I+0rL6gLW+MyJ2NasQNjG5E9CtxXM5yEi+ QSJG1R3XKpdLref9cUB+ddKRoaSg7WAF3mL50ISJtgsChemzpW6+D6FfUyjrqV96aJGG pefwUxm7ZrHgnTNYJXCrBZ1HDdCtxqsVIIojtj0etprZFgHEGIhPMlk1WMrajmzwYehR +hnMV2xRxtg6AxDcJh+Oq2v4l76iQ1UT+YyDs/ASiLU9lLyTIPDCefBeV0IPbYH+wiNC ZfZg== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbiPsRBCuJf3G5WpFS4mTewooaYk8wX5BxlLf5h+6BAI4GaUlYu PPLeIt89tKzUFxw0GmY7wixAdNs+qA0MTQdfd4A= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/Wlzi1wLQd+PZ5HaUykXfe2OA+/Pcr11hoeQJHBP5OaQIcCNFlktbRwfujVVUuyhS6Evj4WlY+LBGWCvj6LOss= X-Received: by 2002:aca:da84:: with SMTP id r126mr5490135oig.219.1545542054624; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 21:14:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <401db2b8-9831-7419-a675-357e41bf24f9@hedeland.org> In-Reply-To: <401db2b8-9831-7419-a675-357e41bf24f9@hedeland.org> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 21:13:57 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Instant crash starting VBox on 12.0-Stable To: Per Hedeland Cc: "freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DB60B8A511 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.96 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.960,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2018 05:14:17 -0000 On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 3:58 PM Per Hedeland wrote: > On 2018-12-22 19:19, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > > Can anyone confirm running VirtualBox on head after 11.0-Release? > > Apparently you meant to ask "after 12.0-RELEASE", though I'm not sure > about the "after" - anyway *on* 12.0-RELEASE, I'm running > virtualbox-ose-5.2.18_1 (from package) with > virtualbox-ose-kmod-5.2.22_1 (from port) without problems. Pretty > light usage though, a single VM running Linux, started "directly" with > "VirtualBox --startvm xxx" and only access via ssh. Starting the > "manager application" i.e. plain "VirtualBox", works fine too, though. > > But, I'm not loading any vboxnet* modules (seems to be more than one > these days), only vboxdrv - and that via kld_list in rc.conf, i.e. I > have no vbox* variables set there. After fighting with the networking > setup (in more complex cases, that I don't currently use) with first > vmware and then qemu I decided to do as little as possible of that > with VirtualBox itself - only bridge to a tapN device, and do the rest > ("actual" bridging/routing) with the standard FreeBSD functionality. > > --Per Hedeland > No, I actually meant "be4fore", but I guess it depends on your point of view.. The issue was first reported on RC2, and I have now tested to before the branch of 12 from head. I am about to test on head from August. It has worked on 11.2 all the way through Dec. 17, so it is something that changed some time ago. Your experience tells me that, as I had suspected, that the issue is with the network module which you do not use. So I am just hoping that someone who was testing head and used VirtualBox with networking. Thanks for the report. It certainly help a bit. Now to boot the August 2018 kernel and see what happens. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683