From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 15 15:17:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BE3106566B for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 15:17:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (gerbercreations.com [71.39.140.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59168FC15 for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 15:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (localhost.eyesbeyond.com [127.0.0.1]) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8FFH5Tl013812; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 08:17:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q8FFH4Kc013793; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 08:17:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) X-Authentication-Warning: misty.eyesbeyond.com: glewis set sender to glewis@eyesbeyond.com using -f Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 08:17:04 -0700 From: Greg Lewis To: Louie Penaflor Message-ID: <20120915151704.GA59299@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <41F864C8-A511-40DA-8A3E-24D320838459@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41F864C8-A511-40DA-8A3E-24D320838459@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: javavmwrapper-2.4 does not always choose the right java vm X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 15:17:06 -0000 On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 06:12:47PM -0500, Louie Penaflor wrote: > I've had similar issue to: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/2012-May/233089.html > except I'm on 2.4. I manually edited the file as the patch isn't > the same, and it worked afterwards. Actually, it works as designed. You may not like the design, but it does function the way I expect it to. > I'm not attaching a patch as I'm not sure if the changes I > made is the proper solution. Can I file a bug somewhere so it can > be updated in the next version? Thanks and I look forward to your > reply! As someone has already replied, if you want it to only use the internal logic there is now an environment variable you can set to get that behaviour. This may result in utilities installed by some ports not working as they were intended to, but you'll get the behaviour you want. -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org