From owner-freebsd-current Thu May 21 13:05:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA18206 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 21 May 1998 13:05:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.15.68.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA18182 for ; Thu, 21 May 1998 13:05:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andrew@zeta.org.au) Received: from gurney.reilly.home (d27.syd2.zeta.org.au [203.26.11.27]) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA05536; Fri, 22 May 1998 06:03:26 +1000 Received: (from andrew@localhost) by gurney.reilly.home (8.8.8/8.8.5) id VAA29290; Thu, 21 May 1998 21:05:47 +1000 (EST) From: Andrew Reilly Message-Id: <199805211105.VAA29290@gurney.reilly.home> Date: Thu, 21 May 1998 21:05:47 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: What do you think about this addition to rc{. To: jkh@time.cdrom.com cc: brianfeldman@hotmail.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <23367.895724363@time.cdrom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 20 May, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >> RTFM :) > > Good suggestion. I suggest you go do that now. :) Just a question about mfs on FreeBSD: If you mounted a perfectly ordinary ufs partition asynch,noatime (or possibly softupdates now) on /tmp, would there really be any performance difference compared to mfs? Doesn't the unified vm/disk cache mean that writes are just as likely to hit a real disk as they are a swap partition? -- Andrew "The steady state of disks is full." -- Ken Thompson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message