From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 10:43:18 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C2237B405; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:43:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EBD43FAF; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:43:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4328CAF34; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:43:17 -0400 (AST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:43:17 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Michael Sierchio , kalts@estpak.ee, David Schultz , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20030307144201.M18433@hub.org> References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <3E68B9B3.9030509@tenebras.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Michael Sierchio writes: > > What a mind-blowingly stupid thing to say. If the concern is > > with stability and performance, one would track -SECURITY and > > not -STABLE. > > What a mind-blowingly stupid thing to say. Agreed ... -SECURITY is less stable then -STABLE in my environment ... been there, done that, got the t-shirt ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message