From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 11 08:31:55 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFBE16A417 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:31:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rihad@mail.ru) Received: from mx27.mail.ru (mx27.mail.ru [194.67.23.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50C813C448 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:31:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rihad@mail.ru) Received: from [217.25.20.94] (port=23912 helo=[217.25.20.94]) by mx27.mail.ru with esmtp id 1J20Wh-0003V4-00; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:31:39 +0300 Message-ID: <475E4AC4.4030903@mail.ru> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:31:00 +0400 From: rihad User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071018) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Jeremy References: <475D6FD7.2000500@mail.ru> <20071210120353.B40679@xorpc.icir.org> <475DA624.4010104@seclark.us> <475E1E4D.4090409@mail.ru> <20071211074353.GI11310@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20071211074353.GI11310@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pipe queues X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:31:55 -0000 Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:21:17AM +0400, rihad wrote: >> And if I _only_ want to shape IP traffic to given speed, without >> prioritizing anything, do I still need queues? This was the whole point. > > No you don't. I'm using pipes without queues extensively to simulate > WANs without bothering with any prioritisation. > Great! One fine point remains, though: # ipfw pipe 1 config bw 128Kbit/s will use a queue of 50 slots by default. What good are they for, if I didn't ask for queuing in the first place?