From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 11 15:26:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49B5106566B for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:26:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883BE8FC17 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2BFQBpl055288; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:26:11 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p2BFQBpY055285; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:26:11 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:26:11 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Helmut Schneider In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20110310092002.GC99577@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4D7921A4.1090001@FreeBSD.org> <4D794933.6040107@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:26:11 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update of ImageMagick to 6.6.7.10, dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:26:13 -0000 On Fri, 11 Mar 2011, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > >> On 03/10/2011 13:29, Warren Block wrote: >>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Doug Barton wrote: >>>> On 03/10/2011 02:40, Helmut Schneider wrote: >>>>> >>>>> ...most of "my" users won't run Typo3 and X on the same >>>>> machine. :) >>>> >>>> Sounds like it's time for imagemagick-nox11 slave port. >>> >>> Would that be different from turning off the X11 config option of >>> the ImageMagick port? >> >> The idea of having a slave port would be to allow ports like typo3 to >> depend on it directly, and reduce the chances of user confusion. > > Where should I request/ask for a nox11 port? (And no, ImageMagick, even > a "simple" subport, is nothing I can maintain) It should just be a little Makefile. Copying from the ghostscript-nox11 port: WITHOUT_X11= yes MASTERDIR= ${.CURDIR}/../ImageMagick .include "${MASTERDIR}/Makefile" Untested.