From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 17 13:11:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11308106566B for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:11:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex@stangl.us) Received: from stangl.us (stangl.us [66.93.193.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E7E8FC2C for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:11:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex@stangl.us) Received: by scout.stangl.us (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 563A8B856; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:11:30 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:11:30 -0500 From: Alex Stangl To: utisoft@gmail.com Message-ID: <20090617131130.GF78640@scout.stangl.us> References: <984490.6805.qm@web43139.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> <20090617045535.GD78640@scout.stangl.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: SA , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd "toaster" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:11:31 -0000 On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:17:32AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > Just curiosity, what's wrong with source upgrading? Isn't it miles > easier than reinstalling? Probably nothing. I haven't done it before, so there's the usual apprehension dealing with the unknown. I originally thought that since I just use a generic kernel, a binary upgrade should be quickest, easiest, and safest. Freebsd.org was touting the freebsd-update script, so that seemed the obvious way to go. I guess I'll clean up the mess left by freebsd-update and try the route of upgrading via source. But then I am left wondering why the freebsd.org site continues to recommend using freebsd-update which is seemingly broken and unsupported, while people on the mailing list recommend source upgrades instead. Thanks, Alex