From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 8 16:11:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2A716A4CE; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 16:11:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.dsl.isometry.net (cpc3-oxfd2-6-0-cust207.oxfd.cable.ntl.com [81.103.193.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8C343D13; Mon, 8 Dec 2003 16:11:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robin@isometry.net) Received: from isometry.net (ishadow.dsl.isometry.net [195.137.51.150]) by mx.dsl.isometry.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B5710A; Tue, 9 Dec 2003 00:11:03 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <3FD5130C.3030502@isometry.net> Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 00:10:52 +0000 From: Robin Breathe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: <3FD4F748.4050900@isometry.net> <3FD508A7.3010901@isometry.net> In-Reply-To: <3FD508A7.3010901@isometry.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernelmode(subr_turnstile.c) w/ trace X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 00:11:08 -0000 > [...] > db> panic > panic: from debugger > cpuid = 0; > Debugger("panic") > > Fatal trap 3: breakpoint instruction fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0672525 > stack pointer = 0x10:0xdcacc714 > frame pointer = 0x10:0xdcacc720 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = IOPL = 0 > current process = 536 (ngctl) > Stopped at turnstile_wait+0x86: movl 0(%edx),%eax > panic: from debugger > [...] I forgot to point out that this second panic didn't occur in the previous case, without INVARIANTS. I'd be interested to know if that's relevant? - Robin -- Robin Breathe robin@isometry.net +441865741800