From owner-cvs-all Wed Jun 30 23:37:24 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [209.157.86.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90F914E28; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 23:37:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id XAA44203; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 23:37:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 23:37:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <199907010637.XAA44203@apollo.backplane.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Andreas Klemm , "Rodney W. Grimes" , Bill Fumerola , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc services References: <65911.930810321@zippy.cdrom.com> Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk :> How about this.... what does Linux assign radius to? : :Good question. I did some sniffing around and found: : :slackware 3.0: Don't contain a radius entry in /etc/services :S.U.S.E. 6.1: 1645/1646 (old entries) :Debian 2.2 / Red Hat 6.0: 1812/1813 (new entries) with old entries under : "old radius" : :- Jordan Ok, then I'll change my opinion: Since the new RFC's seem to agree with the mainstream linux distributions ( Red Hat & Debian ), we should bring our radius entries into agreement as well. (If they had disagreed I would have thrown up my hands :-)) -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message