From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 17 16:11:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D9B16A400 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 16:11:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from redbull.bpaserver.net (redbullneu.bpaserver.net [213.198.78.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA4D13C46C for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 16:11:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p54A5D5D3.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.213.211]) by redbull.bpaserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD662E22E; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:11:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97CE5B4817; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:11:41 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 17:11:41 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Boris Samorodov Message-ID: <20070317171141.4651ce0d@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <24354789@srv.sem.ipt.ru> References: <20070316120038.2iizia24mc4wcw8s@webmail.leidinger.net> <22612203@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20070316164102.4whd3ow7c4kswcwo@webmail.leidinger.net> <01172875_-_@srv.sem.ipt.ru> <20070317082052.07bec42a@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <24354789@srv.sem.ipt.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.9; i686-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BPAnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-BPAnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BPAnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-15.364, required 8, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -15.00, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME 0.00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14, SMILEY -0.50) X-BPAnet-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-Spam-Status: No Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New linux_base X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 16:11:48 -0000 Quoting Boris Samorodov (Sat, 17 Mar 2007 18:58:34 +0300): > Hello, Alexander! > > > On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 08:20:52 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Quoting Boris Samorodov (Fri, 16 Mar 2007 20:59:16 +0300): > > > On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:41:02 +0100 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > > > > > As you have the next linux_base port ready, > > > > > > BTW, about this port. It's almost ready (other infrostructure linux > > > ports are not at the state for testing) and works fine with old (or > > > better to say current) linux ports. But this needs more testing with > > > real applications. > > > We are talking about which version of FC? And it is the version which > > does not work with 2.4.2 but will work with 2.6.16 when 2.6.16 is > > finished. Right? > > Oh, sorry, I should have been more precise. > > This is a port of FC6. Which doesn't work (doesn't install to begin > with) with 2.4.2. But when 2.6.16 is finished we may stay with FC4 (as > a default linux base port) for a while. And yes, this port is intended > to become a future linux base port. (hm, depending on how much time > it is needed to settle 2.6.16...) If you don't already set IGNORE based upon the linux osrelease it would be a good idea to do so before you commit this. And I think we need a repocopy from fc4 for this. > > > The port needs only one cosmetic patch to bsd.linux.rpm (ftp path to > > > sources changed since FC4) and may be used with > > > OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=fc6. No other changes to run/test are needed. > > > Do we have an override for this so that people which want to give it a > > try don't have to patch it? > > This patch is needed only for package building to fetch rpms with > sources (when PACKAGE_BUILDING is set). Normal users usually don't do > it. :-) Anyway, the patch should have been committed before/while > committing linux_base-fc6. As long as it works with fc4 and fc6... > > > I'd better commit it (to get users a chance to test it) but sometime > > > ago you mentioned that you have some upcoming changes to linux* ports > > > which you would like to commit. I'm in doubt whether to wait for those > > > changes or not. What do you think? > > > Diff attached, just integrate the change and go ahead as it fits. > > Just to clearify, did you mean that I may commit that patch? When we change this we also need to change the portrevision. If you want to commit it, go ahead. I was waiting for a functional change to the fc4 port to commit this at the same time. If you don't want to commit this to fc4, just integrate it into fc6. Bye, Alexander. -- temporary routing anomoly http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137