From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 25 03:45:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44E037B401 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 03:45:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arthur.nitro.dk (port324.ds1-khk.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.113.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0143443F75 for ; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 03:45:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from simon@arthur.nitro.dk) Received: by arthur.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E105A10BF8B; Wed, 25 Jun 2003 12:45:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 12:45:19 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: Michael Nottebrock Message-ID: <20030625104518.GA402@nitro.dk> References: <200306251557.25303.m-trade@hotpop.com> <3EF96EF8.4C4DED20@mindspring.com> <200306251210.50565.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200306251210.50565.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: M-Trade cc: FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8MB install X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 10:45:23 -0000 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2003.06.25 12:10:42 +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Wednesday 25 June 2003 11:44, Terry Lambert wrote: >=20 > > Alternately, you could find a FreeBSD 1.1.5.1 distribution on the > > net somewhere, and install that, instead; I have personally run > > that version of FreeBSD on a 4M 386SX, to use it as an X Terminal. > > 8-). >=20 > FWIW, the last FreeBSD release I managed to install on an 8mb machine fro= m=20 > CD-ROM+bootfloppies was 4.1.1. Can anybody else confirm this ? It seems like the documetation need to be updated to state this. Have anybody made any recent tests on CURRENT (and STABLE for that matter) with regards to minimum RAM requirements, install and normal runtime? --=20 Simon L. Nielsen --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE++X0+8kocFXgPTRwRAhH0AJ9F+ZPAxV9hkG+s9/cCjob9aIP+SQCglc5E G4znPXZhZUJBFLxgjn9LKLI= =ikDU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp--