Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2023 09:08:24 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ipfw@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 267278] ipfw mask addr:mask syntax creates wrong rule Message-ID: <bug-267278-8303-KP15DD2H8d@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-267278-8303@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-267278-8303@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D267278 --- Comment #7 from Marek Zarychta <zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl> --- (In reply to Andrey V. Elsukov from comment #6) Thank you again for the reply in this educational and explanatory PR Andrey= .=20 I am still working on making IPFW and PF better work together with regard to nat64lsn, but it's not officially supported and seems to be a bit tricky. T= he initial results are almost satisfying. So far, for many years, I have been using IPFW for dummynet and PF for the = rest of packet processing and it worked flawlessly, now PF has dummynet support,= but no NAT64 capabilities, so still IPFW is indispensable. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-267278-8303-KP15DD2H8d>