Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Nov 2021 13:46:35 -0500
From:      Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>
To:        Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
Cc:        Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Reasons for keeping sc(4) and libvgl ?
Message-ID:  <CAPyFy2BZfV-QQbzG=Lb6KaWcN93bEHpuravnCGqxEvi%2Bck%2BfYQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5b9baa6a-66ee-549d-a3e9-f6ea4e6e5016@grosbein.net>
References:  <20211126160454.3eb827365a02103169ab9adc@bidouilliste.com> <5b9baa6a-66ee-549d-a3e9-f6ea4e6e5016@grosbein.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 26 Nov 2021 at 11:00, Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> wrote:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230172

As far as I can tell all reports in this PR are due to broken ACPI
tables reporting that there is no VGA present. If there are any cases
where

  hw.vga.acpi_ignore_no_vga="1"

does *not* work as a workaround, please note them in the PR.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2BZfV-QQbzG=Lb6KaWcN93bEHpuravnCGqxEvi%2Bck%2BfYQ>