From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb 22 15:17:42 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E1DBB16A4CE; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:17:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D76F743D1D; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:17:42 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([24.7.73.28])
          by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP
          id <2004022223173801300dbfk1e>; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:17:42 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1])
	by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA52472;
	Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:17:38 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:17:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
To: Vasenin Alexander aka BlackSir <blacksir@number.ru>
In-Reply-To: <NKEJKOHEKMBIMCCEHEPKGEOFCEAA.blacksir@number.ru>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0402221516560.52329-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
cc: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@cell.sick.ru>
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: ng_netflow: testers are welcome
X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Internet Services Providers <freebsd-isp.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-isp>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-isp@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp>,
	<mailto:freebsd-isp-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:17:43 -0000

you can open a divert socket as a netgraph node by openning a ksocket
node with protocol 'divert'.



On Sun, 22 Feb 2004, Vasenin Alexander aka BlackSir wrote:

> Yep... But it not so obvious for man like me, who thought just a week ago
> that netgraph is something beetween net & graphics... like MRTG
> LOL
> 
> Another question:
> Is is possible that ng_netflow take packets _after_ they are diverted by
> natd? I apologise, that this would require divert implemented as netgraph
> node? So... I have no idea how this would work with ipfw ruleset... Any
> ideas?
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
> > [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gleb Smirnoff
> > Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 2:58 AM
> > To: Julian Elischer
> > Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Bjoern A. Zeeb; Vasenin Alexander aka
> > BlackSir; freebsd-net@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: ng_netflow: testers are welcome
> 
> > Is it possible to make port dependant on kernel module
> > shipped with base system? How?
> > For example sysutils/ips is not dependant on ipfw. It is obvious
> > that ipfw is required for it, as well as in case of netgraph
> > and ng_netflow.
> 
>