From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 3 17:07:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0580E16A4CE for ; Tue, 3 May 2005 17:07:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fri.itea.ntnu.no (fri.itea.ntnu.no [129.241.7.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADBE43D31 for ; Tue, 3 May 2005 17:07:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from svein-freebsd-questions@theloosingend.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fri.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92307EA7 for ; Tue, 3 May 2005 19:07:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maren.thelosingend.net (maren.math.ntnu.no [129.241.211.48]) by fri.itea.ntnu.no (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Tue, 3 May 2005 19:07:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 34094 invoked by uid 1001); 3 May 2005 17:07:06 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 May 2005 17:07:06 -0000 Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 19:07:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen X-X-Sender: sveinhal@maren.thelosingend.net To: Jim Freeze In-Reply-To: <427799B2.4030704@freescale.com> Message-ID: <20050503190634.F34076@maren.thelosingend.net> References: <42768E35.2090706@freescale.com> <20050503100739.Q29995@maren.thelosingend.net> <427799B2.4030704@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Content-Scanned: with sophos and spamassassin at mailgw.ntnu.no. cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How does one bootstrap DNS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 17:07:09 -0000 * Me: > > <>[1] One could argue that I should have at least two name servers, but why > > should I need greater redundancy on my name servers, than I have on my > > other services? If my dns is down, so is my mail, and am in the mercy of > > the sender to keep retrying anyway. * Jim Freeze [2005-05-03 10:33 -0500] > Yes, exactly. Is it permissable for ns1 and ns2 to point to the same IP > address? Yes, this should work