From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 16 10:10:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8516616A4CE for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 10:10:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bbnest.net (t113169.ap.plala.or.jp [220.220.113.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF7243D5C for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2004 10:10:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (bland@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bbnest.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i3GHACRc054371; Sat, 17 Apr 2004 02:10:12 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from bland@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <40801374.201@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 02:10:12 +0900 From: Alexander Nedotsukov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040414 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lee Harr References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: inkscape needs gcc > 3.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 17:10:14 -0000 Lee Harr wrote: > Hi; > > Is it very difficult to make a port build with a non-default compiler? > > I reported a crash bug for inkscape-0.38.1 at the inkscape site and > they say it is too difficult to support the old gcc due to advances > in C++ support in the 3.* versions. I just commited small hack wich I believe will improve the situation. Please cvsup and retest. Thanks, Alexander. > > The bug report is here for anyone interested: > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=933879&group_id=93438&atid=604306 > > > There seem to be some other problems too... like saving as a .ps > results in a corrupted file... but I am not going to report the bug if > it may be just a compiler issue. > > Thanks for your time.