Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 22:10:18 -0500 (EST) From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjc@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> To: ajk@paw-in-eye.net (Alec Kloss) Cc: jmutter@commercialmovers.com (James A. Mutter), freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: x.x.x.x on pn0 but got reply on pn1 Message-ID: <200001040310.WAA11524@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> In-Reply-To: <200001031845.MAA13399@D2SI.COM> from Alec Kloss at "Jan 3, 2000 12:45:58 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alec Kloss wrote, > James A. Mutter said: > > > What's causing this? I'm getting an occasional kernel error complaining > > that '111.222.333.444 is on pn0 but got reply on pn1' - > > > > pn0 = "inet 192.196.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0" > > pn1 = "inet 207.XXX.X.XX netmask 255.255.255.248" > > > > Ideas? Need more info - let me know. > > > > It looks very much like you've got two network cards plugged onto the > same lan. I ran a box like this for several days until I got around > to buying a second hub to make the private network truly private. It > didn't seem to cause any problems. Having two cards on one LAN lowers the overall throughput on the network to which they are attached. Depending on how the network is configured, your "private" network may be leaking out to the public (e.g. when the device to the outside world is a bridge). If you have one physical network, you should be using _one_ NIC with an alias. /etc/rc.conf would look like this, ifconfig_pn0="inet 207.XXX.X.XX netmask 255.255.255.248" ifconfig_pn0_alias0="inet 192.196.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0" -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@home.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001040310.WAA11524>